REPORT 2
Intravenous treatment



This is the
second method of reducing the toxicity of
chemotherapy. The report introduces an amazing substance that is able to drag other medications with it into cancer cells, selectively targeting the malignancies.

Medical science is aware of this method since 1968, when the first, very successful clinical trials were carried out in a US hospital. This fact begs the question: Why is the information supressed? Why is it not used? You will be interested to know that many other uses of this substance have been developed by some of the most reputable members of the medical establishment, and the product is approved by the FDA. Yet, there is no mention of the clinical results in any medical course, and there is only one single clinic in the USA where it is used as a cancer treatment by medical doctors and oncologists.

In the meantime, over 600 thousand cancer patients died in the USA in 2006, and the vast majority went through highly toxic chemotherapies that caused unimaginable suffering and toxic damage. The method to avoid this has been there, the medical authorities knew about it, yet it has not been used. Their excuse: not approved, experimental, potentially dangerous, no double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, etc. In other words, hundreds of thousands of patients must die, because nobody came up with millions of dollars to obtain clinical evidence. The astonishing results, achieved by non-approved, off-label procedures by MDs and naturopaths don't count, because they are merely anecdotal data. It is interesting to note that patients who survive by unapproved methods do not have a place in cancer statistics. It can be said that as far as the allopathic establishment is concerned, these people are only anecdotally alive.

This second method is available at a US clinic, but any doctor, be it an MD or a naturopath who is licenced to give intravenous treatments can do it. In other words, it is available to you, even if your own doctor refuses to consider it. Of course, your insurance policy won't cover it. Not enough toxicity, you see?

BACK TO ...
REPORT REVIEWS
.