|
By the time cancer can be clinically observed and diagnosed, it may have already been growing in the body for 8, 10, possibly more years. It usually takes cancer a long time to become clinically detectable. What a pity that it cannot be detected at its earliest stage! It would be so much easier to eradicate it. Wouldn't oncologists be overjoyed if such a diagnostic tool would be available?
Actually, three such methods exist. Two of them are FDA approved, and they
are available since quite a few years. The third one is used by naturopathic
and holistic physicians.
The first one is a blood test. Its false positive/negative rate is 5%,
but if the test is repeated, its reliability is raised to almost 100%.
It can detect cancer in the body at least 12-15 months before it becomes
clinically detectable.
The second one is the most reliable when used for breast cancer. It can
recognize formation of malignancies up to 10-12 years before they become
observable by other methods. It doesn't produce false positives or negatives.
It is a gentle, completely non-invasive technique.
The third is a computerized electronic device that can scan the whole body
without any invasive procedure or discomfort.
The obvious question is, why aren't these methods used as preventive measures?
We are at the point where it is predicted that statistically, every second
person in America will have cancer sometime during his or her life time.
Preventive diagnosis could dramatically change this, yet it is not utilized.
For further details, please read our report titled Long Range Survival.
It is remarkable that, at the same time, mammography is strongly promoted,
when it is opposed by world class experts all over the world. According
to scientific literature, "Mammography screening is a profit-driven
technology posing risks compounded by unreliability." "Mammography
poses a wide range of risks of which women worldwide still remain uninformed.
" For a detailed description, please click here.
Allopathic medicine does not attempt to prevent the recurrence of cancer,
once treatment has been completed. Their strategy is to use maximum level
and quantity of toxicity to eradicate the disease. Integrative physicians
approach the issue very differently. In the eyes of a holistic doctor poisoning
the system of a cancer patient with high-dose chemotherapy and radiation
is an obsolete, barbaric, and profit-driven procedure that should be declared
illegal.
© Gabe Bartha 2007. All rights reserved
|
