Welcome, and thank you for
visiting us!
" The times they are a-changin'!" As recently as 10-12 years ago,
cancer patients had very little choice. They either submitted to the "standard"
protocol, or they had to experiment with marginal solutions, often offered
by quacks and charlatans.
Thanks to recent breakthrough developments in holistic medical research,
and to the growing interest in integrative cancer treatments by legitimate,
licensed medical practitioners, the situation has changed dramatically.
Who are we?
HolisticCancerSolutions.com is the website of Eclectic Medicine International
(E.M.I.), a 15-year old medical data research and information service firm,
focusing on non-toxic medications and therapies.
How can this website help
you?
Our task is to present evidence-based scientific information about integrative
cancer treatments that are being ignored or suppressed by the medical establishment,
or are so new that very few people know about them. The contents are being kept up-to-date on a regular basis. This website has last been updated in August, 2008.
On the 2nd of June, 2007, we have received the following message from a private cancer clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Treatments at the clinic are provided by medical doctors and oncologists. The protocol, referred to below, has been suggested by us, acting as data research consultants.
Dear Gabe,
I just wanted you to know that we are getting outstanding results since we began a cooperative collaboration with Dr. Tullio Simoncini (all thanks to you.) One of our patients was fighting a "three headed monster." He had been diagnosed with prostate cancer, recurrent stage 3 melanoma, and had a brain tumor which proved to be non-Hodgkins lymphoma. (Mostly inoperable) The surgeons could not get all of it, and it had placed enough pressure on his optic nerve that he could no longer drive. After we treated this patient (with the suggested protocol), for just the final third or six days of his 18 day treatment, his PET scan results proved that two of those three malignancies, the melanoma and the prostate cancer, had been totally eradicated, and the third, the NH Lymphoma in the brain, was in retreat, with 80% of it gone. We are continuing to treat him for another two rounds of DMSO (18 days) only this time he will get the full benefit of the added SB from the beginning. All of our other patients are receiving the newly modified protocols too--will keep you advised as the PET scans come back and we have solid proof. Warmest regards, Maureen.
Further information about this clinic and the protocol can be found in Report #30.
Please note: If you are in a hurry, go to F.A.Q., then to REPORT REVIEWS. However, if you have the time to read the other pages, you will find some
surprising and revealing information about cancer and your oncologist.
* * * * *
DISCLAIMER
The information on this
web site is presented for educational and informational purposes only. It is not
intended as a substitute for the advice and care of a licensed medical
professional.
* * * * *
About the Reports
There are twenty-nine reports on this website. Eighteen of the reports
describe new, powerful integrative cancer treatments that are available
now (by the time you read this, the number may have grown); eleven reports
are about diagnostic/monitoring methods, cancer diet, private cancer clinics,
some marginal treatments, treatment combinations, and long term survival
strategy. Every treatment protocol listed is supported by scientific research
and clinical data. None of them is based on hearsay or wishful thinking.
Should your doctor become interested in some of the treatments, he will
find contact information in the reports he can use in order to obtain further
details. Many of these treatment protocols are being used by some courageous
medical doctors and oncologists, despite the disapproval of the medical
authorities, while others are part and parcel of naturopathic practice.
(Naturopathic doctors have licence to give intravenous treatments in 10
US states, and in 5 Canadian provinces. For details, please click here.)
You will also find a paper on Long Term Survival. There is nothing more
heartbreaking than first to witness an astounding improvement in a cancer
patient's condition, only to watch the same patient succumb again to the
disease 12-15 months later. This is a pattern well-known among those who
keep an eye on the field of alternative medicine. A person returns from
a Mexican clinic or has just finished a life-saving course of non-toxic
treatment, then a year later the cancer returns with a vengeance, and the
patient dies within a short time. Why? What happened?
In Long Term Survival, this problem is analyzed and explained. It doesn't
need to happen, and never should be permitted to happen. Cancer patients
must realize that once they are in remission, that is when the long range
fight for real survival begins. One cannot bargain with cancer, and one
must not take it lightly. Long range survival requires long range measures.
When someone has been diagnosed with cancer, usually the next therapeutic
step in allopathic medicine is chemotherapy. Is chemotherapy toxic? Is
it dangerous? Does it have bad side effects?
Your oncologist's answer should be the following: No, it is not toxic at
all to healthy cells, only to cancer cells. You see, Mrs. Smith, we only
use potentiated chemo. This permits us to selectively target your cancer cells. We, you
and I, can choose between two excellent potentiators. Both are well researched,
safe, and FDA approved substances, both will mix well with our chemotherapy
agents, and selectively carry them into the cancer cells. There will be
no collateral damage, no nausea, no hair loss, no damage to major organs.
On the other hand, the efficacy of the treatment will be augmented significantly.
What do you say, Mrs. Smith, should we go ahead with the treatment?
Most likely the patient would answer, Of course. Let's start immediately.
Why doesn't this happen? Why will your oncologist look at you as if you
were crazy if you asked him about such potentiation? It is beyond the scope
of this site to discuss the political and financial racketeering of the
medical cancer industry. (To see some statements about the efficacy and
nature of chemotherapy by highly reputable physicians and research scientists,
please click here.) Our cancer reports are not about medical politics, but about information
on non-toxic treatments, and how these new, little-known integrative treatments
may benefit you.
Yet, this is not an abstract, theoretical issue; if you have cancer, the
odds are overwhelming that you will have to deal with the question of chemotherapy,
its alleged efficacy and its very well established toxicity. The bottom
line of the question is this, IF THERE IS A NON-TOXIC, LEGAL, SAFE AND
PROVEN FORM OF CHEMOTHERAPY, ARE YOU ENTITLED TO IT?
Two of our cancer reports focus on selectively targeted non-toxic chemotherapy.
Most medical doctors will say that such thing doesn't exist. They are lying,
or they are ignorant. Report #1 will prove that to you beyond the shadow
of doubt.
"I believe that we will look back at today's medicine, especially today's
oncology, as part of an ignorant and barbaric time, when patients were
administered highly toxic doses of expensive drugs, while a gentle technique
... was being widely ignored."
| From the book by Dr. Ross A. Hauser MD |
One of the "gentle chemotherapy" protocols uses a drug that is
on the market since decades, is being taken regularly by millions of people
in North America as well as around the world, it is FDA approved (not the
protocol, only the drug!), and the procedure is being offered by a number
of licenced, board certified medical doctors and oncologists in the USA.
Why is it not available for you, from your own medical doctor or oncologist?
And why does your health insurance company refuse to pay for it? Your survival
may depend on how toxic your chemotherapy will be. Read the evidence, consult
with doctors who offer the treatment, then demand it for yourself, if it
becomes the treatment of your choice. Only you, the patient, can change
the system. If you wait for the AMA and the FDA to change their policies,
you will see your freedom of medical choices completely disappear.
What makes the policy of a highly toxic therapy with its destructive side effects even more repulsive is the fact that there is a second substance also capable of guiding chemo selectively to cancer cells. The cancer
targeting nature of this compound is known since 1968. It has been demonstrated
through clinical trials in American hospitals; the results have been published
in peer reviewed medical journals, yet the concept is suppressed, and it
has never been taught in any medical school. It is amazing to read medical
papers and articles lamenting on the lack of selectivity in chemotherapy,
while the solution is being carefully suppressed.
Of course, the standard response of the medical establishment in cases
like this one is that the procedure has never been studied in controlled
double-blind clinical trials, and it is not FDA approved. What they fail
to mention is that such studies cost tens of millions of dollars, and only
large pharmaceuticals are able to afford them. However, they have little
incentive to do so, and every reason to fight it tooth and nail, because
the targeted form of chemotherapy only requires about 5-10% of the usual
quantity of chemotherapeutic drugs, thus drastically reducing profits.
Your oncologist likes you to think of him as a medical scientist who provides
his patients with scientifically tested and proven treatment protocols.
So, what kind of studies were the approved chemotherapies put through?
Writes Ralph Moss, Ph.D., science writer and former assistant director
of public affairs at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY:
"If you can shrink the tumour 50% or more for 28 days you have got
the FDA's definition of an active drug. That is called a response rate,
so you have a response..(but) when you look to see if there is any life
prolongation from taking this treatment what you find is all kinds of hocus
pocus and song and dance about the disease free survival, and this and
that. In the end there is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority
of cases actually extends life, and this is the GREAT LIE about chemotherapy,
that somehow there is a correlation between shrinking a tumour and extending
the life of the patient."
In 2002, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that
in the previous year, the average oncologist had made $253,000 of which
75% was profit on chemotherapy drugs administered in his/her office. (This information is confirmed by a congressional testimony. This document provides a rare and fascinating insight into the financial
aspect of the oncology business.) Yet, surveys of oncologists by the Los Angeles Times and the McGill Cancer Center in Montreal show that from 75% to 91% of oncologists would refuse chemotherapy as a treatment for themselves or their families. Why? Too toxic and not effective. Yet, 75% of cancer patients are urged to take chemo by their oncologists.
Testimony from Mark E. Miller, PhD, Executive Director of
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
Before the Subcommittee on Health Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives:
Medicare covers drugs administered in physician offices, including drugs used for chemotherapy. These drugs are not usually purchased at retail pharmacies. Providers buy the products and then bill Medicare as they administer them to patients. Physicians in only two specialties - hematology oncology and medical oncology - submitted claims for almost 50 percent of total billing for Part B drugs in 2004, not including drugs provided in dialysis facilities.
From NBC Nightly News Story 'Cancer Docs Profit From Chemotherapy Drugs' :
NEW YORK — It is a unique situation in medicine: Unlike other kinds of
doctors, cancer doctors are allowed to profit from the sale of chemotherapy
drugs.
Doctors in other specialties
simply write prescriptions. But oncologists make most of their income by buying
drugs wholesale and selling them to patients at a marked up prices.
See also: Pharma
Cash Incentives to Oncologists
Did you know that oncologists are the retail arm of drug manufacturers?
This information brings up a very disturbing question. When it comes to
your survival, how far do you trust a person whose revenue and standard
of living depends on the quantity of toxic drugs put into your veins? How
anxious will that doctor be to embrace a protocol that uses only 5% of
the usual poisons, eliminating 95% of his or her commissions? Aren't we
looking here at a blatant conflict of interest?
It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his revenue depends
upon his not understanding it.
Upton Sinclair
What the cancer patient must realize is that chemotherapy doesn't have
to be toxic and harmful. Another vitally important fact is that there are over a dozen integrative protocols without using any toxic drugs that are at least as cytotoxic to cancer cells, if not more so, as high
dose chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Chemotherapy itself doesn't have to be toxic and harmful, but
a cancer treatment protocol doesn't have to include any toxic substances. There are other, better solutions than chemotherapy,
targeted or not.
"Remember one thing. If you are ever diagnosed with cancer, it is you who
faces the crisis, not your doctor. It is your health and your life on the
line. At that point, TAKE CONTROL of your health, don't hand that power
over to your doctor."
Dr. Greg Kerr, M.D.
|
........© Gabe Bartha 2007. All rights reserved
|
|
